Of all the pagan religions, I have always considered the pre-Christian cult of Mithras to be particularly interesting, mostly, I admit, because Mithras is how a Roman suffering from a speech impediment would pronounce the word mistress, as in: "I have a secret altar nest in the city where I go to visit my Mithras."
My "lisp theory" of antiquity obviously explains why women were denied initiation into the cult's mysteries. After all, what self-respecting neophyte would want his wife finding out that he went to see his Mithras every night? Especially when he's spent his entire paycheck on a slaughtered bull for his Mithras, and consequently can't give his wife any housekeeping money.
Is it any wonder that such a henpecked husband would seek solace in the arms of his Mithras? Yes indeed, if only scholars would listen to Crypto-Archeologists like me, I think we would have a much better understanding of what motivated ancient man.
Okay. Perhaps a Roman would not actually say the word mistress in the first place. But that is beside the point. After all, we are talking archeology here, not linguistics.
Yeah, but you Cryptos are everywhere! It is hard for a real scientist, who believes in reason, to proceed with all you Cryptos about, making jokes and teasing us reasoners and procking mogress, I mean mocking progress. Talk about linguistics? That famous punster, Baldwin of Boston, as he is known, has virtually ruined the English language with his rampant malaprops. Or is that . . .
Posted by: Mortimer Shy | September 05, 2006 at 13:11
The sleep of reason begets the dream of nonthenth. And that is all I have to say on the matter.
Posted by: stephenesque | September 05, 2006 at 13:23
i think this is of interest to neither linguisticaters nor anthroapologists butt of immense tissue to sexacologists who probe the bed of reason in flushing hopes of treason,..such as this:
"can't give his wife anything housekeeping money"
which reeks of homewreck.
did you due your homewreck tonite?
Posted by: Dr.VonLevy Freud-Shapiro | September 05, 2006 at 22:09
Good popint!
Posted by: stephenesque | September 05, 2006 at 22:15
-good popoint-
as in 'pop it in' the oven?
as in "pop popped it in the oven and out came my baby sister"
eg: all housework duties are contemporaneous and urgent in the wife.
man, you should be more precise and to the popoint.
Posted by: the father(Pop) of pop-psychology | September 06, 2006 at 07:33
Aren't people required to use their real names around here? Who is this popinjay who changes in every comment?
Posted by: Mortimer Shy | September 06, 2006 at 13:00
Oh I don't know. Pseudonyms are encouraged. Especially if they are Jupiter Maximus or Mars Avenger or something like that.
Posted by: stephenesque | September 06, 2006 at 13:10
Yes, I am certainly not against pseudonyms, being one myself, but can a person change their own pseudonym? I don't think so!
Posted by: Mortimer Shy | September 06, 2006 at 19:15